Voici les commentaires que nous avons reçus en réponse à la question de consultation en ligne suivante : Dans le cadre des affaires courantes, quel exemple le plus décourageant du fardeau de la réglementation fédérale avez-vous rencontré? Que faudrait-il faire pour résoudre le problème de la paperasse dans ce domaine?
La Commission sur la réduction de la paperasse s'engage à respecter la Loi sur les langues officielles et à faire en sorte que tous les renseignements soient fournis en français et en anglais. Les renseignements venant de sources externes sont disponibles dans la langue officielle dans laquelle ils nous ont été fournis. Les commentaires sont offerts à titre d'information seulement; aucune modification n'y est apportée. La Commission ne demande pas de rétroaction sur ces commentaires.
Hello, We recently took on a convenience store, and are looking to offer some food items. All items are delivered by a certified distributor, but as a result, I have to ensure that all of my employees have a food prep license. Plus...
In dealing with teh Canada Revenue Agency, the website provides much good information but to be able to talk to a person about a particular issuse is very difficult. The issue is not so much the red tape but the isolation created by the internet and websites. It is peculiar to have "access to the world" through technology yet feel so isolated at times. Plus...
Currently, I am required to complete the Statistics Canada Payroll Survey, which is required monthly for a year period. The agent who I had reviewed my First of Twelve was very kind, however, I am confused why a sampling of data is not done for shorter periods of time, and why we are required to give hours of our time to provide this data, with no compensation. Plus...
"the most frustrating example of federal regulatory red tape" Premiums for: Taxes. WSIB. CPP. EI. Then there is financing, as the Government doesn't handle grants/loans directly it is left to banks or other financial institutions to deal with. Plus...
Correcting government errors, dealing with auditors who arbitrarily or unjustifiably (have no evidence) increase tax owed based on faulty assumptions, poor attitudes, sloppy paperwork, incorrect understanding of the law. Plus...